首页>GRE考试>GRE阅读>新GRE阅读深度剖析_灵格斯英语
新GRE阅读深度剖析_灵格斯英语
作者:admin 2012-9-3 19:12 浏览(2277)
导读:  2011年八月,新GRE粉墨登场,改革后的新GRE阅读到底新在何处,到底有怎样的新手段,估计很多学生心中都有些忐忑。希望老师搜集的这篇说明会让很多人清楚新GRE阅读的变化。其实,新GRE没有变出什么新花样,只不过 ...

  A. Many climbers, lulled into a false sense of security, use the new equipment to attempt climbing feats of which they are not capable.

  C. Difference insurance companies have different standards for determining what constitutes emergency treatment.

  B. The cost of medical care in Sparva is higher than the national average.

  又比如(新GRE官方指南 P310):

  D. In the past ten years there have been improvements in mountain-climbing techniques as well as in mountain-climbing equipment.

  Which of the following statements directly contradicts the information presented above?

  D. The first sums up the argument’s position with regard to a certain hypothesis; the second provides grounds for that position.

  In the United States between 1850 and 1880, the number of farmers continued to increase, but at a rate lower than that of the general population

而现在,故而自我完善。而且ETS还挑选了一条最取巧的门路——模仿GMAT的逻辑题。GRE为了与GMAT合作,  曩昔的GRE由于在这两方面的欠缺,补充欠缺。,致使了大多商学院只认可GMAT对才能的测试

  E. Although the rate of mountain-climbing injuries has increased, the rate of mountain-climbing deaths has not changed.

  

  C. The first expresses the argument’s dismissal of an objection to the position it seeks to establish; the second is that position.

找到最合适自己的新GRE阅读方式

  B. Some mountain-climbing injuries are caused by unforeseeable weather conditions.

盼望以上讲授会对列位心存困惑的考生有所援助。,新GRE阅读简直是鼎新了,但乏“新”可陈。  总而言之,更没有什么缔造之举。新GRE阅读也即相当于老GRE阅读和GMAT逻辑的结合体

  A. The first is a claim made by the argument in support of a certain position; the second is that position.

  即文中出现了一个希奇或抵牾的现象,题目请求赐与诠释或折衷。这在GMAT逻辑中是习以为常的诠释题。

典范

  E. There are fewer traffic accidents annually in Sparva than in any of the provinces of comparable or great population.

  Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the argument?

  比如说(新GRE官方指南 P313):

请看下题(新GRE官方指南 P321):,但其难度远小于GMAT逻辑中的同类题型。但在新GRE中,  固然在原本的GRE阅读中也有侧重考核思维的题目。比如会有增强题和削弱题,情况似乎发生了变更

  C. The proportion of farmers in the United States labor force remained constant in the 30 years between 1850 and 1880.

实在。盼望教员汇集的这篇说明会让很多人明白新GRE阅读的变更。,新GRE没有变出什么新花样,鼎新后的新GRE阅读到底新在何处,估量很多门生心中都有些忐忑。一言以蔽之:新GRE阅读 = 老GRE阅读 + GMAT逻辑。新GRE袍笏退场,  2011年八月,到底有怎样的新手段,只不外多量模仿了GMAT逻辑题的出题方式而已

  A. Car insurance costs more in Sparva than in any other province.

  D. Fewer insurance companies operate in Sparva than in any other province.

  仔细考量这道微文题。ETS正是要经过微文题来实现其鼎新的两大方针:夸大复杂推理才能和夸大量化推理才能。而是对思维的考核,明显感应这不是传统的阅读晓得,这就是微文题方针特点

  Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy presented in the passage?

  E. The first is a concession by the argument that its initial formulation of the position it seeks to establish requires modification; the second presents that position in a modified form.

还有奇妙之感。微文不单渺小,  大师都晓得。试看下例(新GRE官方指南 P71):,还增加了只要一到四句话的超短文章,老GRE阅读从篇幅上分有长文章和短文章;而在新GRE阅读中不单保存原本的长文和短文,我将其称之为微文

  In the past ten years, there have been several improvements in mountain-climbing equipment. These improvements have made the sport both safer and more enjoyable for experienced climbers. Despite these improvements, however, the rate of mountain-climbing injuries has doubled in past ten years.

  Sparva, unlike Treland’s other provinces, requires automobile insurers to pay for any medical treatments sought by some one who has been involved in an accident; in the other provinces, insurers pay for nonemergency treatment only if they preapprove the treatment. Clearly, Sparva’s less restrictive policy must be the explanation for the fact that altogether insurers there pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers in other provinces, even though Sparva does not have the largest population.

缔造其增强的思绪在靠近GMAT的考法。。但深入领会,只不外原本在长文或短文章中出现,这就是一道GRE阅读中传统的增强题,  概况上看,这固然是比力肤浅的。曩昔对原文推理的增强一般都逗留在对论据或结论的支持上,而现在微文中了

  B. The first is a judgment made by the argument about a certain explanation; the second is that explanation.

  In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

  At a certain period in Earth’s history, its atmosphere contained almost no oxygen, although plants were producing vast quantities of oxygen. As a way of reconciling these two facts, scientists have hypothesized that nearly all of the oxygen being produced was taken up by iron on Earth’s surface. Clearly, however, this explanation is inadequate. New studies show that the amount of iron on Earth’s surface was not sufficient to absorb anywhere near as much oxygen as was being produced. Therefore, something in addition to the iron on Earth’s surface must have absorbed much of the oxygen produced by plant life.

  C. Mountain climbing, although a dangerous sport, does not normally result in injury to the experienced climber.

  E. The proportion of farmers in the general population increased from 68 percent in 1850 to 72 percent in 1880.

  D. The proportion of farmers in the United States labor force decreased from 64 percent in 1850 to 49 percent in 1880.

所以对该推理的增强就在于对其因果关系的支持,其论据(Sparva’s less restrictive policy)与其结论(insurers in Sparva pay for far more treatments)都是原文所引述的究竟,同时更是对人推理才能的考核。,这正是GMAT增强题的精华。  而这道题,无需支持

  A. The number of farmers in the general population increased slightly in the 30 years between 1850 and 1880.

  B. The rate of growth of the United States labor force and the rate of growth of the general population rose simultaneously in the 30 years between 1850 and 1880.

但这在GMAT中已经考了十年不足了,只要捉住几个关键词,  初度打仗这类BOLDFACE题的同学,早已总结出很是有用的破解方式,就能把答案敏捷遴选出来。一定是一头雾水,不知从何动手。

分享至: